graph reasoning
- Asia > China (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
Graph Query Networks for Object Detection with Automotive Radar
Saini, Loveneet, Tercan, Hasan, Meisen, Tobias
Object detection with 3D radar is essential for 360-degree automotive perception, but radar's long wavelengths produce sparse and irregular reflections that challenge traditional grid and sequence-based convolutional and transformer detectors. This paper introduces Graph Query Networks (GQN), an attention-based framework that models objects sensed by radar as graphs, to extract individualized relational and contextual features. GQN employs a novel concept of graph queries to dynamically attend over the bird's-eye view (BEV) space, constructing object-specific graphs processed by two novel modules: EdgeFocus for relational reasoning and DeepContext Pooling for contextual aggregation. On the NuScenes dataset, GQN improves relative mAP by up to +53%, including a +8.2% gain over the strongest prior radar method, while reducing peak graph construction overhead by 80% with moderate FLOPs cost.
- North America > United States (0.46)
- Asia (0.14)
MPRM: A Markov Path-based Rule Miner for Efficient and Interpretable Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Li, Mingyang, Wang, Song, Cai, Ning
Rule mining in knowledge graphs enables interpretable link prediction. However, deep learning-based rule mining methods face significant memory and time challenges for large-scale knowledge graphs, whereas traditional approaches, limited by rigid confidence metrics, incur high computational costs despite sampling techniques. To address these challenges, we propose MPRM, a novel rule mining method that models rule-based inference as a Markov chain and uses an efficient confidence metric derived from aggregated path probabilities, significantly lowering computational demands. Experiments on multiple datasets show that MPRM efficiently mines knowledge graphs with over a million facts, sampling less than 1% of facts on a single CPU in 22 seconds, while preserving interpretability and boosting inference accuracy by up to 11% over baselines.
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Rule-Based Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.35)
CARL-GT: Evaluating Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Tu, Ruibo, Kjellström, Hedvig, Henter, Gustav Eje, Zhang, Cheng
Causal reasoning capabilities are essential for large language models (LLMs) in a wide range of applications, such as education and healthcare. But there is still a lack of benchmarks for a better understanding of such capabilities. Current LLM benchmarks are mainly based on conversational tasks, academic math tests, and coding tests. Such benchmarks evaluate LLMs in well-regularized settings, but they are limited in assessing the skills and abilities to solve real-world problems. In this work, we provide a benchmark, named by CARL-GT, which evaluates CAusal Reasoning capabilities of large Language models using Graphs and Tabular data. The benchmark has a diverse range of tasks for evaluating LLMs from causal graph reasoning, knowledge discovery, and decision-making aspects. In addition, effective zero-shot learning prompts are developed for the tasks. In our experiments, we leverage the benchmark for evaluating open-source LLMs and provide a detailed comparison of LLMs for causal reasoning abilities. We found that LLMs are still weak in casual reasoning, especially with tabular data to discover new insights. Furthermore, we investigate and discuss the relationships of different benchmark tasks by analyzing the performance of LLMs. The experimental results show that LLMs have different strength over different tasks and that their performance on tasks in different categories, i.e., causal graph reasoning, knowledge discovery, and decision-making, shows stronger correlation than tasks in the same category.
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
GraphOTTER: Evolving LLM-based Graph Reasoning for Complex Table Question Answering
Li, Qianlong, Huang, Chen, Li, Shuai, Xiang, Yuanxin, Xiong, Deng, Lei, Wenqiang
Complex Table Question Answering involves providing accurate answers to specific questions based on intricate tables that exhibit complex layouts and flexible header locations. Despite considerable progress having been made in the LLM era, the reasoning processes of existing methods are often implicit, feeding the entire table into prompts, making it difficult to effectively filter out irrelevant information in the table. To this end, we propose GraphOTTER that explicitly establishes the reasoning process to pinpoint the correct answers. In particular, GraphOTTER leverages a graph-based representation, transforming the complex table into an undirected graph. It then conducts step-by-step reasoning on the graph, with each step guided by a set of pre-defined intermediate reasoning actions. As such, it constructs a clear reasoning path and effectively identifies the answer to a given question. Comprehensive experiments on two benchmark datasets and two LLM backbones demonstrate the effectiveness of GraphOTTER. Further analysis indicates that its success may be attributed to the ability to efficiently filter out irrelevant information, thereby focusing the reasoning process on the most pertinent data. Our code and experimental datasets are available at \url{https://github.com/JDing0521/GraphOTTER}.
- North America > Canada > Ontario (0.16)
- North America > Mexico > Mexico City > Mexico City (0.04)
- Europe > Ireland (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Question Answering (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (1.00)
Neural-Symbolic Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey from a Query Perspective
Liu, Lihui, Wang, Zihao, Tong, Hanghang
Knowledge graph reasoning is pivotal in various domains such as data mining, artificial intelligence, the Web, and social sciences. These knowledge graphs function as comprehensive repositories of human knowledge, facilitating the inference of new information. Traditional symbolic reasoning, despite its strengths, struggles with the challenges posed by incomplete and noisy data within these graphs. In contrast, the rise of Neural Symbolic AI marks a significant advancement, merging the robustness of deep learning with the precision of symbolic reasoning. This integration aims to develop AI systems that are not only highly interpretable and explainable but also versatile, effectively bridging the gap between symbolic and neural methodologies. Additionally, the advent of large language models (LLMs) has opened new frontiers in knowledge graph reasoning, enabling the extraction and synthesis of knowledge in unprecedented ways. This survey offers a thorough review of knowledge graph reasoning, focusing on various query types and the classification of neural symbolic reasoning. Furthermore, it explores the innovative integration of knowledge graph reasoning with large language models, highlighting the potential for groundbreaking advancements. This comprehensive overview is designed to support researchers and practitioners across multiple fields, including data mining, AI, the Web, and social sciences, by providing a detailed understanding of the current landscape and future directions in knowledge graph reasoning.
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.05)
- North America > United States > New York > New York County > New York City (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > Australian Capital Territory > Canberra (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Semantic Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.46)